In Off-topic

Has anyone seen it yet? I have, and I thought it was really fun. I'll post more of a review later, because I off to go see "Batman Begins".

the new Batman SUCKS! doesnt even fallow the story line at all. but if you ignore the story like and pretend like this is the first Batman movie ever to come out its cool. just watch and see, story lines dont add up.

Who the hell is scarecrow anyways?
I never heard of him.

Anyways i think Bewitched is pretty good.

Im not talking about the comics. Im talking about the movie story line. Im not going to give away the movie to ppl who havent seen it but just watch the first Batman with Micheal Keyton (not Batman Returns) (spelling of the name is wrong but Im sure you guys know who I mean), and then go see this new one. things dont add up for anything in Gotham. (korny joke, I know...) but I thing they should just call the movie "Batman: the movie... that wont add up with the rest" but yeah, its good. it just doesnt add up.

Well, this has gone very off topic, but....who cares. It is on the Off-Topic board. Anyways, I saw the movie, and I thought they did a good job with it. It doesn't go with the other movies because it seems they want to re-do the movies they have done.



Spoilers

SPOILERS BIG TIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!























I cant take it anymore! I gotta spill the beans! THE JOKER KILLED BatmanS PARENTS! NOT THAT DUDE IN THE NEW Batman MOVIE!!! NOT ONLY THAT, Batman IS WANTED BY THE COPS JUST AS THE BAD GUYS SO HOW COULD HE BE ALL BUDDY BUDDY WITH GORDON IN THIS ONE AND IN THE 1989 ONE, GORDON WANTS HIM LOCKED UP?!?!?!?!?!?!?! ANOTHER THING, HOW COULD THE JOKER START DOING CRIMES BEFORE HE EVEN IS CREATED?! Batman DROPED THE JOKER INTO SOME GREEN SLIM AND THUS MAKEING THE JOKER IN THE 1989 ONE!!!! AND THE BATSIGNAL WAS GIVEN TO GORDON IN THE 1989 Batman MOVIE SO HOW IS IT THE NEW Batman GIVES HIM ONE TOO?!?!?!?! AND HIS HOUSE BURNS DOWN? WHERE THE HELL DID THAT COME FROM? AND THE CELL PHONE CRAP BUT I ALREADY POSTED ABOUT THAT. okay, Im sorry. its just SOOOOO many things dont add up its killing me. am I the only one who noticed these things??

Alright, hold on. Now, it's Hollywood. Things change all the time.

There's no reason to complain about who killed Bruce's parents. In the comics, it was neither the Joker or anyone else. It was originally a guy named Joe Chill. This was brought about in the comic/graphic novel . Later, things changed in the comics and the story says that Bruce had never found out who killed his parents. I haven't read any current Batman comics, but as far as I know it's still the same.

The Scarecrow is an enemy of Batman's from a long time ago. He's appeared in quite a few Batman comics. Right off-hand I can't remember his history, but he has been around for quite awhile.

Ra's al Ghul is another enemy of Batman's from a long time ago. Batman actually had a love affair with the guy's daughter, and has had some pretty crazy encounters with him.

I like the way they portrayed the Joker in Burton's , but I hope they go more in-depth in the next one if he is the character. Joker is actually Batman's worst enemy... He's done CRAZY things in the comics. He raped and crippled Barbara Gordon (aka Batgirl), took pictures during the event, captured Commissioner Gordon, and forced him to look at the pictures of his own daughter being raped! If that's not bad enough, the Joker also killed the second Robin, Jason Todd, by beating him with a crowbar... Yeah, there's a ton of stuff they can tap into with the character the Joker. I hope they get into his dark-side.

Anyway, the bottom-line is that things change in almost every story out there... don't make such a big fuss over it.